It is my intent in this post to provide a true, accurate overview of the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. In this, I will try to show the duplicitousness of this president, his true agenda and the severity of the destruction which he has caused to this nation and which will be caused by his "transformation" of this nation.
To understand the actions of any politician one must understand his or her particular mode of operation. With this president, I have noticed that while he is doing one thing in the public eye, he is doing something else, indeed usually in general terms at least something very different if not completely the opposite, in private. Thus, it is very instructive to observe what Barack Obama is doing with his left hand while he is publicly showing his right. Example: the President is publicly touting his defense of internet privacy. I, along with many others, such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, have been alarmed by his willingness to support overt spying programs: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/05/president-hints-new-surveillance-powers-during-speech-tell-white-house-protect. Here's another example: the President came out recently with the idea of two years of "free" community college education (that means we and our progeny, for at least several generations, will pay for it). The latest is that this would be subject to certain 'qualifications'. At the same time, he has been refusing to enforce our border laws and his administration has actively pursued states which attempted to do so (Arizona and Texas). His administration has both allowed children unaccompanied by their parents to cross over the border and has fed, housed and protected those children (at our expense, of course). It has been reported that many of those children have been released into the United States to end up God knows where. Coincidence? Who do you think will 'qualify' most easily for that "free" college tuition? You and your progeny? Give me a break! I learned early on that promises made by this president always come with caveats which are 'to be revealed later'. To put it bluntly, the man is what my dad (God rest his soul) used to refer to as a "sneak".
Barack Obama has repeatedly touted http://www.dividedstates.com/list-of-failed-obama-green-energy-solar-companies/. He has also consistently opposed the Keystone oil pipeline, a project about which I also admittedly have reservations (I'll consider the pipeline a good idea provided that it is constructed wholly above ground (that way any leak will be more immediately noticed and can be dealt with more promptly, with less environmental damage). To my knowledge, the current plan involves the use of underground piping. In the meantime, his administration has been a consistent enemy to the use of coal as an energy source (a proven energy source using proven technologies) in the U.S. and has also sought to make dramatically more complicated and expensive the use of any wood-burning or pellet-burning technology. This will cripple the homesteading movement or anyone wishing to live 'off-the-grid' as it will eliminate or make much more expensive the option of burning wood or pellets for heat or any other use. These regulations will also cost current owners of wood-burning appliances money as they will make an estimated 90 percent of these units unsaleable. Keep in mind that the first of these proposed regulations is due to go into effect in March, with the rest going into effect in future years. As usual, King Barry's team of misfits and malcontents does not want its intent to be apparent at once, but wants to sneak it past the American people.
Oh, but it gets better: police can now look through your walls (USA Today, 1/20/15), thanks to the Obama Administration. They can also fly drones overhead for whatever purpose, thanks to King Barry! Hitler would have loved this! Just think: no more knocks at the front door, no more 'ee-oooo, ee-oooo' European-style sirens rolling up outside as in the old movies); just blow up the house! Boom! Gone! No more depending on the neighbors or your children to spy on you! Just set a drone outside the window! In retrospect, at least Hitler was honest about his desires!
I'm trying really hard to find a graceful way to end this article. The thought which keeps occurring to me is this: anyone who thinks that this country is now anything but a police-state-in-waiting or a "soft police state" (iron fist still clothed in velvet glove, for now) is either stupid, has been living under a rock or is wilfully ignorant. If you believe the police state isn't in waiting, which are you? Better yet, if you believe that this administration has not at least taken the most draconian, most obvious steps so far to accomplish this goal, which are you?
Monday, January 26, 2015
Friday, January 16, 2015
Changes . . .
Some of you have I'm sure been wondering where this blog is going. As best I can, I will try to explain it to you.
Due to the possibility of having to engage in a job search at some point in the future, and knowing of the habit of some employers of searching the web for a potential employee's 'tracks', I have considered whether it is wise to have my thoughts so openly available on the World Wide Web. While I have doubts about this, this is such a labor of love that I will continue it, at least for the time being. I think it's sad that Americans even have to think in these terms; that we have to consider that our personal opinions may be used against us for employment purposes; that our performance on the job, past or present, may not be enough to consider whether we should be employed in the future.
Then there is another consideration: whether our expression of our opinions will be used against us by government. I find the fact that we have to consider this possibility to be truly odious. Along with I'm sure the rest of you, I was truly alarmed to find out that apparently, organizations which could be identified with certain political or social causes were targeted by the Internal Revenue Service for harassment. If this was done to organizations, and I believe that it was, I consider it illogical to assume that this was not also done to individuals. I have recently had my difficulties with the I.R.S. While I certainly did 'ask for it' in certain ways, considering events of the last few years I have to wonder whether I have been targeted.
I have many times considered closing this blog; I have wondered whether it would be better for me and for my loved ones to simply 'go underground'; that is, to quietly prepare for that moment at which at least some of us will go more completely 'off the grid'. I assure you that such a moment could arrive. At right about these times, though, that nagging thought begins to appear in my head; that thought which says that it's absolutely essential for good Americans to STAND UP; to STAND TALL AND BE COUNTED; to STAND UP AGAINST TYRANNY (Right now the iron hand is in the velvet glove; however, I believe that there are forces in this nation and beyond which would not be at all above taking off that velvet glove; all they need is the right circumstances.)
I will also admit several other things to you: I have a 'day job'; in fact, I run a business which takes a considerable amount of my time. I work about 35-60 hours per week. I know that for some of you that may not seem much; however, due to personal considerations, it is enough to plain tucker me out! So, I do not have the time at this point to do personal research. Thus, I will probably be linking to a great deal of material. I cannot always vouch for its' veracity. However, I will use my best judgement as a former beat reporter, news writer and newscaster and as a lifelong devotee to knowledge of politics and current events (Yes, literally since I was five!) as to whether to trust a source. If I suspect its' trustworthiness, I will not use it. However, ultimately you are the judge. At some point, perhaps this blog will become successful enough financially that I will be able to devote more time to it, with the eventual goal being making this my full-time job (oh, such a dream!) In the meantime, we will have to simply do the best that we can.
Due to the possibility of having to engage in a job search at some point in the future, and knowing of the habit of some employers of searching the web for a potential employee's 'tracks', I have considered whether it is wise to have my thoughts so openly available on the World Wide Web. While I have doubts about this, this is such a labor of love that I will continue it, at least for the time being. I think it's sad that Americans even have to think in these terms; that we have to consider that our personal opinions may be used against us for employment purposes; that our performance on the job, past or present, may not be enough to consider whether we should be employed in the future.
Then there is another consideration: whether our expression of our opinions will be used against us by government. I find the fact that we have to consider this possibility to be truly odious. Along with I'm sure the rest of you, I was truly alarmed to find out that apparently, organizations which could be identified with certain political or social causes were targeted by the Internal Revenue Service for harassment. If this was done to organizations, and I believe that it was, I consider it illogical to assume that this was not also done to individuals. I have recently had my difficulties with the I.R.S. While I certainly did 'ask for it' in certain ways, considering events of the last few years I have to wonder whether I have been targeted.
I have many times considered closing this blog; I have wondered whether it would be better for me and for my loved ones to simply 'go underground'; that is, to quietly prepare for that moment at which at least some of us will go more completely 'off the grid'. I assure you that such a moment could arrive. At right about these times, though, that nagging thought begins to appear in my head; that thought which says that it's absolutely essential for good Americans to STAND UP; to STAND TALL AND BE COUNTED; to STAND UP AGAINST TYRANNY (Right now the iron hand is in the velvet glove; however, I believe that there are forces in this nation and beyond which would not be at all above taking off that velvet glove; all they need is the right circumstances.)
I will also admit several other things to you: I have a 'day job'; in fact, I run a business which takes a considerable amount of my time. I work about 35-60 hours per week. I know that for some of you that may not seem much; however, due to personal considerations, it is enough to plain tucker me out! So, I do not have the time at this point to do personal research. Thus, I will probably be linking to a great deal of material. I cannot always vouch for its' veracity. However, I will use my best judgement as a former beat reporter, news writer and newscaster and as a lifelong devotee to knowledge of politics and current events (Yes, literally since I was five!) as to whether to trust a source. If I suspect its' trustworthiness, I will not use it. However, ultimately you are the judge. At some point, perhaps this blog will become successful enough financially that I will be able to devote more time to it, with the eventual goal being making this my full-time job (oh, such a dream!) In the meantime, we will have to simply do the best that we can.
Saturday, April 26, 2014
E.P.A. Seeks To Increase Its' Control Over Vast Tracts Of Private Land
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is seeking to further regulate vast tracts of land belonging to private citizens through redefinition of rules involving "navigable waterways". Here's more on the story from WorldNet Daily.
I had considerable trouble finding the proposed rule on the E.P.A.'s website. I note, though, that once I found it, I had no trouble at all finding positive feedback for the proposed rule (even though it is "proposed"; it hasn't been issued in its' final form) on the E.P.A. website.
Here's the point to remember, folks. You need three things to survive: food, water and shelter. Without any of these three things you WILL NOT THRIVE. Therefore, if anyone (or anything) controls ANY of these three things, that party controls YOU! By my interpretation of this proposed rule, the federal government through the E.P.A. is trying to DRAMATICALLY increase its' control over the entire U.S. population through control of water use and ultimately, water ACCESS. This would be particularly crushing for those of us who choose to live in ways that require us to use water readily available on our land. This would include farmers, ranchers, homesteaders, survivalists and anyone else trying to 'live off the land'. In fact, I'm willing to say that this could be used to eventually force members of the aforementioned groups off of their land. It would also force these particularly proud and resourceful people under the thumb of and, for many of them, onto the nipple of government. Of course, that may be just what the Obama Administration wants!
Here's a thought: how about having ONLY STATE AND LOCAL governments regulate how non-navigable waterways which run over, beside, through or under the property of more than one party and having ONLY THE PROPERTY-OWNER dictate what can happen on a waterway which exists only on that property?
I had considerable trouble finding the proposed rule on the E.P.A.'s website. I note, though, that once I found it, I had no trouble at all finding positive feedback for the proposed rule (even though it is "proposed"; it hasn't been issued in its' final form) on the E.P.A. website.
Here's the point to remember, folks. You need three things to survive: food, water and shelter. Without any of these three things you WILL NOT THRIVE. Therefore, if anyone (or anything) controls ANY of these three things, that party controls YOU! By my interpretation of this proposed rule, the federal government through the E.P.A. is trying to DRAMATICALLY increase its' control over the entire U.S. population through control of water use and ultimately, water ACCESS. This would be particularly crushing for those of us who choose to live in ways that require us to use water readily available on our land. This would include farmers, ranchers, homesteaders, survivalists and anyone else trying to 'live off the land'. In fact, I'm willing to say that this could be used to eventually force members of the aforementioned groups off of their land. It would also force these particularly proud and resourceful people under the thumb of and, for many of them, onto the nipple of government. Of course, that may be just what the Obama Administration wants!
Here's a thought: how about having ONLY STATE AND LOCAL governments regulate how non-navigable waterways which run over, beside, through or under the property of more than one party and having ONLY THE PROPERTY-OWNER dictate what can happen on a waterway which exists only on that property?
Monday, April 14, 2014
Hundreds Of Patriots Defend Nevada Ranch
The federal government has withdrawn from the ranch of Cliven Bundy, near Bunkerville Nv., after a crowd of patriots ranging in size from hundreds to over a thousand descended on the ranch and surrounding area. Here's a report from The Sipsey Street Irregulars website.
Sunday, March 30, 2014
The Herd Mentality In Journalism
Don't get me wrong. I realize that several hundred people presumably lost their lives. The loss of that Malaysian aircraft is a tragedy of the first order. However, it's been three weeks since authorities, and, it seems, EVERYONE; three weeks of conflicting stories and precious few facts.
I have been told by my consultants, however, that the way to get people to read this blog is to go along with the mainstream; don't rock the boat; talk about a horrible airplane tragedy or a high school girl who apparently suffers an awful end at the hands of third-world hooligans with official cover. Talk about the five-alarm fire that happened downtown tonight if you're local. Do ANYTHING but talk (or write) about how the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is being taken out from under us, being systematically deconstructed, at an alarming pace. But, I've been told to follow the herd, so here goes:
There has been a horrible disappearance of a Malaysian airliner with 300-plus people on board. Governments from around the world are at least making the attempt to make it look as if they are looking for this thing. Frankly they haven't found jack-squat which they can PROVE was a part of this airplane. And that's after three weeks. How about this? Howza 'bout these people agree to get back in touch with us when they have something and the mainstream media, and others, get the hell off of this and move on to a few of the things which TRULY threaten the well-being of this country!
I have been told by my consultants, however, that the way to get people to read this blog is to go along with the mainstream; don't rock the boat; talk about a horrible airplane tragedy or a high school girl who apparently suffers an awful end at the hands of third-world hooligans with official cover. Talk about the five-alarm fire that happened downtown tonight if you're local. Do ANYTHING but talk (or write) about how the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is being taken out from under us, being systematically deconstructed, at an alarming pace. But, I've been told to follow the herd, so here goes:
There has been a horrible disappearance of a Malaysian airliner with 300-plus people on board. Governments from around the world are at least making the attempt to make it look as if they are looking for this thing. Frankly they haven't found jack-squat which they can PROVE was a part of this airplane. And that's after three weeks. How about this? Howza 'bout these people agree to get back in touch with us when they have something and the mainstream media, and others, get the hell off of this and move on to a few of the things which TRULY threaten the well-being of this country!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
