Trump 1; Dems, Liberals and Other Psychopaths 0

Alright, let's get this straight.  This is how I have it between President Donald Trump and the various Dems, RINO's, liberals and other malcontents.  The President says that the Obama Administration bugged Trump Tower.  The Dems and other malcontents (including, yes, YOU, Senator John McCain) seem to think that the Trump transition team colluded with the Russians and that the Russians somehow influenced the 2016 presidential election.  President Trump HAS STATED that he got news of the bugging of Trump Tower from two New York Times articles.  So, so much of the talking heads and Congress crowing about how he has to come up with "proof" and mentioning some kind of idiot "deadline" to which the President is not beholden anyway.  The research has been done; the Times did articles on FISA court warrant applications which were submitted by the Obama Administration for permission to conduct surveillance at Trump Tower.  The first application was rejected (which is rare with the FISA court.  Usually they pretty much rubber-stamp these things.)  So, that first application must have been a real humdinger.  The second was accepted.  Would an administration have gone to the trouble to apply for a FISA court warrant without intending to use it?  I doubt that.  So, in all likelihood, there was really surveillance.  By the way, the Times is what we ordinarily refer to in the news biz as an "authoritative source" (Whether it should be considered such is a discussion worthy of much time on another day.)  Secondly, the Obama Administration has a well-documented history of using federal agencies to persecute opponents.  Remember the IRS scandal?  So, in all likelihood, yes, surveillance of some type went on.  Whether Trump used the precisely correct word for the method of surveillance is unimportant.  The aforementioned malcontents claim that the Trump transition team was in communication with Russians.  So what?  It would be understandable and so I hear, routine, for the Russians to speak with someone representing a potential new administration.  Was the Trump team aware of any Russian involvement in the purloining of carelessly-guarded emails from the Clinton campaign?  There's no proof of it.  Were the Russians involved in any theft of said emails?  Our security organs say that there are indications of that but offer no proof of it.  Did the Russians try to hack either campaign?  They've admitted that they tried to hack both of them but claim that they had no success.  Did they try to influence American public opinion?  There's no proof of it but I'll go ahead and say "yes" because this is something that modern advanced nations routinely do, including our own!  Anyone remember President Obama's trip to Israel?  How about the fact that he sent an entire team there, I'm sure at our expense, to unseat Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu?  The pot is calling the kettle black!  While I remain open to further developments, it seems to me that right now, the score is "Trump 1, Malcontents 0".  Right now, this is taking an inordinate amount of the time, attention and resources (that means "money", as in "taxpayer money", as in your and my money) of the United States government.  If this proves to be a red herring, as I suspect, those responsible for this should be held accountable. 

CNN Loses Feed When Congressman Tells An "Inconvenient Truth"

Do you think that your mainstream media is free and unbiased?  You may want to have a look at this, from Constitution:

http://constitution.com/cnn-cuts-feed-congressman-says-refugees-account-30-terrorism-investigations/

I admit that there's no proof that CNN cut the feed.  Still, I think it's curious that the signal 'went dead' while the alleged connection between immigration and terrorism was being discussed, don't you?

Should There Be A "Bloody Monday" In the Trump Administration?

Certain Demoncrats are now calling for the head of Attorney General Jeff Sessions.  Isn't it funny how they easily they turn on a man who was so recently one of their own (a member of the Senate).  But wait!  Let's take a closer look at this:  certain of this party "investigate" a couple of conversations that Sessions admittedly had with the Russian Ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak.  The reason I put the word "investigate" in quotes is because I believe that this is totally political and that if there was no political benefit to it, the Dems would drop it like a hot rock.  So, Sessions talked with the Russians?  So what?  The last time I checked that wasn't a crime, and in fact the Dems have done it too: 

https://unclesamsmisguidedchildren.com/democrat-hypocrisy-sessions-talked-to-the-russians-so-did-they/

Meanwhile, the Left continues to behave like spoiled children:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/02/right-cue-soros-financed-moveon-org-holds-protest-demanding-sessions-resignation/

And a trial lawyer says Attorney General Sessions certainly didn't commit perjury:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/03/02/trial-lawyer-jeff-sessions-absolutely-not-perjure/

Meanwhile, libs still seem to live in an alternate universe, and the Dems still can't seem to prove any conversations between the Trump campaign or representatives of it and the Russian government:

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2017/0302/The-Trump-administration-s-deepening-Russia-problem

Meanwhile, WE'VE been messing with other nations' elections:

https://wikileaks.org/cia-france-elections-2012/#Press%20Release%20(English)

Here's a link to the specific espionage orders:

https://wikileaks.org/cia-france-elections-2012/#release

 

Meanwhile, has it occurred to you that this may be planned?

http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/civil-war-ii/

Look, here's the bottom line:  it's pretty obvious that this has been planned.  The left is being directed by a very cynical cabal the aim of which is to destabilize this President and to destabilize our nation.  It is very well funded.  I can't prove that now but I look for the opportunity.  When and if it presents itself to me I will present the proof of my assertion to you.  The progressive left has attempted to get its' agenda passed for over 100 years.  This started with passage of the 16th and 17th Amendments.  The 16th Amendment made it legal for Congress to tax Americans individually.  Before this, to tax legally, Congress had to charge the States and states in turn could tax their citizens to recover the money.  In fact, it put the boot of the federal government, a most powerful and at times cruel taskmaster, directly on the shoulders of the citizens.  Then the 17th Amendment was passed.  This changed the Constitution to mandate the direct election of U.S. Senators.  This took a huge amount of power out of the hands of the States.  I've heard that this was promoted as increasing democracy.  It did anything but.  It cut out of the loop (the role of electing Senators) state legislators, politicians, people many of whom I'm sure thought like politicians and could figure out what these people were up to.  It also assured the sending to Washington of representatives who eventually would begin to feel separated from and likely superior to the people back home and who could be persuaded to follow a progressive agenda.  The Left almost had this accomplished; the socialistic, top-down, ruled-by-a-global-elite if possible leftists' paradise (hell to the rest of us).  Then we came along!  That is, the rest of us, average Americans who just go to work every day, try our best to be a decent spouse (in some cases) and to raise our children to be moral, happy, productive human beings.  They thought they had it in their grasp and then . . gone!!

This much is apparent.  Barack Obama, while remarking continually about a "smooth transition", has assured anything but.  He has done what he usually does.  I've believed for many years that when the former President is attempting to draw attention to what he's doing with his right hand, you need to watch the left!  It's that hand with which he is usually performing his most nefarious deeds.  While Democrats in the Senate, oddly enough with little power to do so, have managed to slow approval of President Trump's nominations to almost a standstill, Republicans have at least put up with this nonsense and may be tacitly going along.  This keeps Obama appointees in their jobs all over the Executive Branch.  This includes the national security apparatus.  The Trump Administration continues to be beset with leaks, damaging to it even if inconsequential.  For the most part, these leaks seem to be coming from our national security organs.  We need to make sure that a couple of things happen.  First, President Trump absolutely needs Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.  He needs McConnell's help in being willing to bounce the Dems on their pointy little heads, repeatedly if necessary (and it will be).  Remind them that there is a price to be paid for losing and that unless they're willing to go along with the program or at least compromise, that price will be paid by them.  Individually.  Now, McConnell is a spaghetti-spined weasel, so he will probably also need convincing.  I suggest phone calls.  His office phone number is (202) 224-2541.  While we're at it, the web address for the U.S. Senate is https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm.  That's just in case you might want to contact your senators.  Secondly, there needs to be a "Bloody Monday".  Trump has to be careful about this because these people are in many different places in government.  Obama made sure he had his own people all over the place.  Others are G.W. Bush appointees who may or may not be empathetic with Trump's views and plans.  Firing too many of these people at once could be very dangerous to national security.  In fact, having as many positions vacant as we have is dangerous to national security.  I think Trump has been doing an amazing job of operating the Executive Branch at about half-staff but he needs a full staff nonetheless.  You can thank the Dems in the Senate for the fact that he doesn't have that and for any danger which this poses to the country.   

President Donald J. Trump has been receiving a shellacking from the mainstream media and Congress as of late, apparently aided by our country's national security apparatus (And don't feed me this malarkey about Trump making an enemy of the national security apparatus.  These people are supposed to be professionals.  They are not supposed to let their personal feelings get in the way of how they do their jobs.) 

And Just When You Thought You Were Rid Of the Obama Administration

The Obama Administration has left a number of stumbling blocks in the way of any successor but the following information should make the blood of any real, patriotic American run cold.  From The Great American Daily: 

http://greatamericandaily.com/2017/02/09/loretta-lynch-frightening-move-office/.

Let's take this apart a little at a time.  "America’s 60,000-person-strong domestic spying apparatus — to make available raw spying data to all other federal intelligence agencies, which then can pass it on to their counterparts in foreign countries and in the 50 states upon request. She did so, she claimed, for administrative convenience. Yet in doing this, she violated basic constitutional principles that were erected centuries ago to prevent just what she did…"  First, let's take on the potential domestic effect of this.  This reduces what standards of proof may be imposed if a warrant would otherwise be necessary.  That standard may be encased in law but let's face it, it is also in certain situations at least up to an individual judge.  The standard is reduced to "governmental need".  Aren't you glad that your privacy will no longer serve as a bulwark against "governmental need"?  Now here's the really frightening news:  according to the article, this will also make your information (which should be private but isn't because of NSA spying) available to Lord-knows-whom worldwide.  To my mind, this opens at least a couple of possibilities:  that your information will be for sale, perhaps from our own government employees to any of a wide variety of characters worldwide with a wide variety of interests.  The other possibility is truly terrifying.  That is that domestic or foreign interests will be able to use your information to find and subjugate you.  Do you think that's impossible?  Consider what's happening on the streets of the U.S. right now.  What do successful revolutionaries do to overthrow a government?  They get the systems set up!  After you destroy or render ineffective the current system you must have something with which to replace it!  Communications, lines of authority, etc., all have to be constructed.  Funding must be acquired.  If necessary or advantageous, the appropriate government officials must/should be bribed/corrupted/subverted.  You have to find out just how far the people within the current system will let you push.  I believe that's what's happening right now.